In India, the legal framework regarding the treatment of terminally ill patients and their rights to receive palliative care is governed by various laws, regulations, and ethical guidelines.
Get the full solved assignment PDF of MME-104/As-3 of 2024 session now.
When faced with a situation where a terminally ill patient like Arun expresses his wish for palliative treatment, but his family members are denying it due to financial concerns, the treating physician must navigate the situation carefully while upholding the patient’s rights and autonomy. Here’s how the physician can proceed:
- **Assessment of Capacity**: The physician should first assess Arun’s capacity to make informed decisions regarding his medical treatment. If Arun is conscious, cooperative, and able to interact normally with the doctor, it suggests that he has decision-making capacity. The physician should ensure that Arun’s wishes are respected and taken into consideration in the treatment decision-making process.
- **Informed Consent**: The physician should engage in a detailed discussion with Arun and his family members about the benefits, risks, and options for palliative treatment. This includes explaining the nature of palliative care, its goals, and how it can improve Arun’s quality of life and alleviate his suffering. Arun should be provided with all relevant information to make an informed decision about his treatment preferences.
- **Advance Directives**: If Arun has previously documented his treatment preferences through advance directives or a living will, the physician must honor these wishes to the extent legally permissible. Advance directives provide clear instructions regarding the type of medical treatment a person wishes to receive or refuse in the event of incapacity.
- **Ethical Considerations**: The physician must adhere to ethical principles such as beneficence, non-maleficence, and respect for autonomy in guiding treatment decisions. This involves prioritizing Arun’s best interests and ensuring that his autonomy and dignity are respected, even if it conflicts with the preferences of his family members.
- **Mediation and Counseling**: If there is disagreement between Arun and his family members regarding his treatment, the physician can facilitate mediation sessions or involve a medical ethics committee to help resolve conflicts and reach a consensus. Counseling services can also be offered to support Arun and his family members in coping with the emotional and practical challenges associated with his illness.
- **Legal Recourse**: If necessary, the physician can seek legal guidance to ensure that Arun’s rights are protected and upheld according to Indian laws and regulations. This may involve consulting with legal experts or referring the case to relevant authorities, such as a medical board or court, to intervene in cases of medical negligence or violation of patient rights.
- **Resource Mobilization**: The physician should explore options for accessing financial assistance or resources to alleviate the family’s concerns about the financial burden of palliative care. This may include connecting them with government schemes, charitable organizations, or social welfare programs that provide support for terminally ill patients and their families.
- **Continued Advocacy**: Throughout the treatment process, the physician should advocate for Arun’s rights and preferences, ensuring that he receives the appropriate medical care and support tailored to his needs and wishes. This involves maintaining open communication, addressing concerns, and providing compassionate care to both Arun and his family members.
By following these steps and adhering to the legal and ethical framework governing patient care in India, the treating physician can navigate the complexities of Arun’s situation while striving to uphold his rights, dignity, and well-being in accordance with his wishes and values.