Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is a method used to compare the costs and outcomes of different interventions or programs to determine which option provides the most value for money.
Get the full solved assignment PDF of MHH-101/As-3 of 2024 session now.
It’s commonly used in healthcare, public policy, and business to inform decision-making processes. Let me illustrate this with an example:
Imagine a local government is considering two interventions to reduce obesity in the community: implementing a nutrition education program or building more public parks with recreational facilities.
- Nutrition Education Program: This intervention involves hiring nutritionists to conduct workshops, distribute educational materials, and offer counseling sessions on healthy eating habits. The estimated cost of implementing this program is $100,000 per year.
- Building Public Parks: This intervention entails constructing new public parks equipped with walking trails, playgrounds, and sports facilities to encourage physical activity. The estimated cost of building and maintaining these parks is $500,000 upfront, with an additional $50,000 per year for maintenance.
To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis, we need to consider both the costs and the outcomes of each intervention.
Costs:
- Nutrition Education Program: $100,000 per year
- Building Public Parks: $500,000 upfront + $50,000 per year for maintenance
Outcomes:
- Nutrition Education Program: The outcome might be measured in terms of the number of individuals who adopt healthier eating habits as a result of the program.
- Building Public Parks: The outcome could be measured in terms of the number of individuals who engage in physical activity by using the park facilities.
Now, let’s say after implementing both interventions, the following outcomes are observed:
- Nutrition Education Program: 500 individuals adopt healthier eating habits.
- Building Public Parks: 1000 individuals engage in regular physical activity.
To calculate the cost-effectiveness of each intervention, we use the formula:
Cost-effectiveness = Total Cost of Intervention / Total Outcome Achieved
- Nutrition Education Program:
Cost-effectiveness = $100,000 / 500 = $200 per individual adopting healthier eating habits. - Building Public Parks:
Cost-effectiveness = ($500,000 + $50,000 * Number of years) / 1000 = $550 per individual engaging in regular physical activity.
Based on this analysis, we can see that the nutrition education program is more cost-effective in terms of achieving its desired outcome compared to building public parks. However, it’s essential to consider other factors such as long-term sustainability, potential side effects, and equity issues before making a final decision.
In summary, cost-effectiveness analysis provides decision-makers with valuable insights into the relative efficiency of different interventions, helping them allocate resources effectively to achieve the desired outcomes.