In “Samskara” by U.R. Ananthamurthy, one character that stands out for me is Naranappa.
While not necessarily likable in the conventional sense, Naranappa’s character is complex and serves as a catalyst for much of the novel’s exploration of morality, tradition, and societal norms.
Naranappa is portrayed as a rebellious and non-conformist figure who challenges the orthodox Brahminical values of the society in which he lives. His actions, particularly his defiance of caste regulations and indulgence in “impure” activities, provoke strong reactions from the conservative community.
What intrigues me about Naranappa is his defiance and his willingness to question established norms, even at the cost of social ostracization. He represents the tension between tradition and modernity, between the rigid structures of caste and the individual’s desire for autonomy and freedom.
Additionally, Naranappa’s death sets off the central conflict of the novel, forcing the Brahmin community to confront its own hypocrisies and moral ambiguities. Through his character, Ananthamurthy delves into themes of guilt, redemption, and the consequences of one’s actions.
While Naranappa may not be a conventionally likable character, his complexity and the questions he raises make him a compelling figure in “Samskara.” He serves as a vehicle for the novel’s exploration of morality and tradition, prompting readers to reflect on the complexities of human behavior and societal expectations.